1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. SYNCHRONET

  • Build failing...

    From deon@1:103/705 to Digital Man on Tue Mar 24 22:44:36 2026
    Howdy,

    Am I doing a build at a bad time?

    460.4 In file included from wl_events.c:54:
    460.4 wl_proto.h: In function 'wl_shm_pool_destroy':
    460.4 wl_proto.h:1462:87: error: 'WL_MARSHAL_FLAG_DESTROY' undeclared (first use in this function)
    460.4 1462 | WL_SHM_POOL_DESTROY, NULL, wl_proxy_get_version((struct wl_proxy *) wl_shm_pool), WL_MARSHAL_FLAG_DESTROY);
    460.4 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    460.4 wl_proto.h:1462:87: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
    460.4 wl_proto.h: In function 'wl_shm_release':
    460.4 wl_proto.h:2093:77: error: 'WL_MARSHAL_FLAG_DESTROY' undeclared (first use in this function)
    460.4 2093 | WL_SHM_RELEASE, NULL, wl_proxy_get_version((struct wl_proxy *) wl_shm), WL_MARSHAL_FLAG_DESTROY);
    460.4 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Or are there new dependancies?

    I build with:
    make -f install-sbbs.mk RELEASE=1 NO_GTK=1 NO_X=1 SBBSDIR=/opt/sbbs


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From deon@1:103/705 to Digital Man on Wed Mar 25 23:25:56 2026
    Re: Build failing...
    By: Digital Man to deon on Tue Mar 24 2026 05:54 pm

    Howdy,

    Or are there new dependancies?

    I build with:
    make -f install-sbbs.mk RELEASE=1 NO_GTK=1 NO_X=1 SBBSDIR=/opt/sbbs

    Not sure. Deuce is the one that's been making the most recent code changes. "wl" sounds like Wayland stuff, so maybe there's a new dependency introduced with the conio Wayland support. Best to ask Deuce.

    OK, looks like libwayland-dev is a new requirement - it compiles with it.

    I would have thought that NO_X=1 would not require that?


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to deon on Wed Mar 25 13:20:55 2026
    Re: Build failing...
    By: deon to Digital Man on Wed Mar 25 2026 11:25 pm

    I would have thought that NO_X=1 would not require that?

    Well X and Wayland are different things (though both solving more or less the same problem).
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Sling Blade quote #25:
    Karl: they seen fit to put me in here and here I've been a great long while. Norco, CA WX: 83.1øF, 36.0% humidity, 7 mph WNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)